Sunday 20 July 2008

Warty Bliggens

Not a toad but a frog. Kiss it if you like, but it'll still be a frog. Unless it's a metaphor.

Richard was on the phone on Friday; we're doing an interview with a regional newspaper next week. Funny; I remember the headline the same paper ran during the Tribunal, which was a little sensationalist and ever so slightly unpleasant. Hopefully this will prove a happier experience.

It got me thinking of the stuff that was said about me back then, at the time when P&O were merrily spouting out unsubstantiated allegations (are they the same as stinking lies, do you suppose?); and the toads and weasels of the world were busily lapping it up and nodding their heads sagaciously and saying, presumably, "O yes, we know what they're like..."

Anyway, I Googled my name just then, to see if there was anything toxic lying around.

I found this, from the Daily Star

HE'S NOT A FLIRT. .HE'S A LAY-DEE!


Byline: OLIVIA MATTHEWS


A SEX-SWAP sailor didn't blow kisses at shipmates - she was just pouting.

Drusilla Marland was prone to pursing her lips, said her friend X, also born a man.

The transsexuals arrived at an employment tribunal on bikes yesterday, just like Little Britain "Lay-dees" Emily and Florence, played by Matt Lucas, 32, and David Walliams, 34.

Miss McLeod said she had seen the redhead pouting many times but had never taken this as a sexual come-on.

Miss Marland, 48, claims she was hounded out of her job with P&O Ferries due to constant jibes.

The engine room worker said fellow staff quizzed her on her "balls" and referred to her as "he".

Miss Marland, of Bristol, claims she was forced to resign from the Pride of Bilbao, which sails from Portsmouth.

The tribunal also heard that male colleagues complained that Miss Marland joked one of them could be her first sexual partner after she had the full op - claims she denies.

Miss McLeod, 49, said: "As for her 'exaggerated pouting', I have never attached any meaning to it. It's a mannerism, that's all."

P&O Ferries admits sexual discrimination but denies unfair dismissal.
Nicely written, Olivia. I like the subtle way she brought in Little Britain. Apparently David Cameron, head of the Conservative Party, uses a bicycle too, so I guess he must be a "lay-dee" as well. Is that how it works, 'Olivia'?

And then, in number seven position on Google, is someone who describes himself as Admiral Flynn, who has a little blog called "Admiral Online" where he makes querulous noises about the world. Here's a little throw-away remark he made about me:

This is Drusilla Marland.

'She' used to be a man but nobody would possibly know

She/He is claiming unfair dismissal.

She claims some people made fun of her.

Surely not

Note the inverted commas, suggesting that I am not really a she at all; and the she/he thing, which perhaps suggests that I'm not really a human at all. Nicely done, 'Admiral'!


Phew, got that off my chest. No point in jumping up and down and getting annoyed; after all, I was completely vindicated and these silly little people ended up with egg on their faces; but if you ever do pass by this way, Olivia Matthews and 'Admiral' Flynn, I'd like you to know that what you wrote was plain nasty, and that you rendered yourselves contemptible by doing it. At least Olivia was being paid to do it. I wonder if that makes it better, or worse?



17 comments:

  1. It's best left behind, isn't it?

    We'll all have to write something nice about you so that next time you Google your name you'll find something pleasant to read.

    Not long after I started my blog up I discovered that I'd been featured as 'laugh of the week' on someone's (geeky) blog. perhaps we shouldn't google ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree, Anji. I'm moving on from it, but it did hurt at the time, and I'm not entirely immune to the nastiness behind it even now. I wasn't sure whether it would help to write this, but it seemed relevant.

    Did it hurt when you found the geek blog stuff?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dru, I understand this. I would say 'completely'...it can't be complete as it hasn't happened to me - yet. But I get how you felt, and how you still feel.

    What you have done is worth a million, trillion times more than any lines written by some worthless ignorant journalist. Remember that these people consider that they live in a little amoral bubble, seeing themselves as outside society and not so much irresponsible as 'aresponsible' if I can coin a new word.

    I remember years ago watching a tv documentary about a local paper in Birmingham. The scene that stuck in my mind forever was when there had just been some appalling massacre somewhere (was it Dunblane?), and the media was scrambling desperately to get a piece of it...to 'develop the story' as they do. "Sadly" for this newsroom, this was all happening in Scotland, so not much of a Birmingham angle.

    Until news came in that some nutcase had been arrested after trying to go mad in a primary school with a machete (do you remember - the classroom assistant, Lisa Potts, wrestled him to the ground or something, and got lots of awards?). Initially it was unclear whether anyone - children, teachers - had been killed by this maniac, and as the news broke, the interviewer was talking to the Editor (I think it was the editor).

    This was the 'big' story they were after, and very 'timely'. 'Are our schools safe?!' etc etc. The interviewer asked him what difference it would make if children had been killed.

    "I hope so" he said, on camera. And he meant it.

    The story would be much bigger if they had. They would sell more papers.

    It was one of the most chiling moments of tv I can ever recall.

    The person who wrote those words about the court case inhabits the same world as this man.

    You have nothing to do with that world. There is a large empty void between the place where you and I live, and those of our friends, and the decent people of the world, and the territory inhabited by by what I can only describe as a vile sub species.

    And as for the Regional Newspaper interview...I would certainly take the opportunity to remind them of the headline they ran.

    I'd like to direct a few friends over to read this post if I may? It chimes very much with an issue I have been discussing on the Angels site recently...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes it did because I wasn't (still aren't) trying to be pretentious. Out of all of the blogs I've been checking it's usually the geeky clever clogs ones that don't load properly - so there!

    I suppose it's easier to mock someone you don't know - a bit like being rude over the telephone when you wouldn't be face to face

    ReplyDelete
  5. Agreed, Anji; people you only know of in the news or on the internet can seem somehow less real, so it's OK to say bad stuff about them. There's also a denial of humanity here: Olivia Matthews turns me into a caricature from a comedy show, and the 'admiral' withholds acknowledgement of my identity, so I become an un-person and fair game for abuse. It's the same thing that the 'men' at P&O did...

    I'll play it by ear with the forthcoming interview, Jo. I don't automatically treat journalists as enemies, as I continue to believe that there must be some good ones out there, although they may be thin on the ground. Yes, certainly pass the link on.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes you're right Dru...play it by ear. I don't see all journalists this way...but there are some...a breed apart. And they should be stopped (gosh this soapbox is heavy to lift!)

    It comes down to this. All journalists want to sell their stories to editors. All editors want to sell papers and make money.

    Is a 'She wants to be lay-dee!!?' story going to sell more copies than 'Woman fights for compensation after years of abuse by brutes in Channel Ferry' or fewer? The assumption was then...still mostly is now...that the former will make more money. I guess the task is to work to make it the latter.

    Hey. I googled Olivia Matthews. Sure there were hits for people of this name. For the one who wrote this? 0.

    All you need to know eh?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Having looked at his blog, that Admiral bloke is a semiliterate fool, with his double question marks at the end of sentences that aren't actually questions??

    Have posted an Amazon review (despite having nothing particularly profound or original to say) to add to the 'nice' contents of the internet :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dru if you need a Publicist with Risk Management and Damage Control skills, gimme a yell!

    I've watched your story evolve and I think you're openness and outspokenness exceeds the sum of all the twits who have some weird need to poke and point.

    I came out fully a few months ago (although I have been full time since last year, there was a minor public perception issue till May) and I have become a celebrity in my community.

    So much so, we made a film in May that won a Best Film award and just finished another film with 30 kids and 10 parents!

    The parents were great - the kids - my god, I just don't get a break! 30 of them all outside school hours where they can rule my life!

    You keep going girl! I'd love to do a film about you! But I doubt P&O would agree to letting us use their locations :) and I'm not a James Cameron (maybe a Jen Cameron)

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's entirely possible that Olivia Matthews is a nom de plume, of course, Jo; I don't suppose that a byline at the Daily Star looks good on a CV, even for a jaded hack. And I somehow doubt that Mr Flynn has ever taken a ride in the admiral's barge, for that matter. I wonder why he chose that rank? -'Major' is the usual self-promoted rank for lounge bar bores, isn't it?

    Thank you, Roy. And you've read the book! I'm glad you liked it. And thank you for mentioning the illustrations.

    Thanks, too, Ella, though we already have the services of those nice folk at Harvill Secker. Where can your films be seen?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Going off briefly at a tangent, I hope that one day Little Britain is regarded with the same kind of retrospective distaste with which people perceive shows like "Love They Neighbour" today.

    It is sad to see that as the amount of comedy on British television has declined, so has the quality. We no longer have the sharp, well crafted wit of shows like Yes Minister, Fawlty Towers, Only Fools and Horses. Instead the lofty heights of British comedy are dominated by crude caricatures and inane catch phrases, with jokes at the expense of groups of people who have done nothing to deserve such bile.

    Am I taking it too seriously? Well, I don't find LB at all funny, so I suppose I have to.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I really don't associate any of my transsexual friends with the lay-dees on Little Britain, (which I admit I have laughed out loud at), because the reality is so very different, and I think anybody who knows anybody who has undergone that great ordeal, knows that. I think most people with half an ounce of grey matter see that.

    Of course, I can't possibly know what that feels like from your end Dru, knowing that possibly a large slice of the public doesn't know any better, or doesn't care enough to find out the truth, but from my end, I don't take that stereotype at all seriously. I want you to know that I certainly have never judged you by Matt Lucas's scripts! Or any other ridiculous stereotype for that matter. And if I haven't, there are a lot more other people that haven't either.

    Little Britain is just great fun for an expat like me.. My sense of humour is not that sophisticated sometimes..
    I just love laughing at English people now, it's a comfort. We are sort of absurd.
    ;-)

    I daren't google myself.. lol I've done it, it is scary. Thankfully, most of what comes up is me, blogging away here. Phew!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Dru-

    "I don't suppose that a byline at the Daily Star looks good on a CV, even for a jaded hack"

    I think you covered it quite well in that line. These tabloid papers really burn my goat (no animals were harmed in this terrible idiom) and are probably best used to start a fire anyway.

    Or recycled into loo roll.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I've moved from thinking laissez-faire is best, Chandira; there are lots of people who have not knowingly encountered transpeople, and who form their opinions (or swallow them unchewed) from what they see on telly or read in the papers. And so much media coverage of trans stuff conforms to the horrible stereotypes. I chose not to ask for a press ban on my case (I could have done so, and it would have been granted) because I thought thsat it was important to get the issues aired. So I was really dismayed to find that so much of the media stuff tried hard to portray me in the standard sex-crazed tranny narrative, so that rather than change attitudes, the reportage merely confirmed some people's prejudices. So for me the Little Britain stuff is bundled with rubbish press coverage as acts prejudicial to me.

    I'm getting better and more relaxed now; at one time I was so used to people acting rudely and with hostility that I was continually on the lookout for it, which isn't really healthy. But I still think that a lot of media stuff stinks.

    Burn that goat, SR! Another great idiom to chalk up!

    ReplyDelete
  15. I have only just found this post.
    I would like to unreservedly apologise for hurting you with my silly post.

    I am afraid that I never even considered the fact that you might read it and I write my musings on the basis (I thought) that hardly anybody would see them.

    I am a sad old git who has been interested in computers for very many years and just likes playing about with different things that I see.
    My 'blogs' for what they are worth frequently get wiped off the internet because I fiddle about too much and unintentionally delete them. This includes the one with a post about your goodself.

    I would like to make it clear also that I am not an admiral of course. Admiral Flynn was a silly nickname I chose when we were playing about with radio transmission of data in the early seventies (pre - internet).

    I consider myself rightly rebuked and I apologise once again.

    Good luck to you

    ReplyDelete
  16. I guess I'll have to call you Admiral Flynn, as I don't know what other name you go by.

    Thank you for writing a response, and I am glad that you accept that you did wrong. If you've read all this post, you will have realised that I am a very real person capable of feeling hurt, and that I was very much hurt by the ill-informed and just plain wrong comments made about me both in newspapers and in cyberspace.

    I will gladly accept your apology, if, of course, you make it in the form of a post on your blog. You will then have my best wishes.

    Dru

    ReplyDelete
  17. Job done.

    I wish you well in the future.

    Ken

    ReplyDelete